Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Al Idaroh: Journal of Islamic Education Management Studies is a journal published twice a year in print and online by LP3M IAI Al-Urwatul Wutsqo Jombang.

This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication of articles in Al-Idaroh: Journal of Islamic Education Management Studies, including authors, editorial boards, peer reviewers, and publishers. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

​Plagiarism Rules

To validate the submitted articles, the editorial team checks the manuscripts on Google Scholar and also uses plagiarism checker software.

​Publishing Ethics Guidelines

The publication of an article in Al-Idaroh: Journal of Islamic Education Management Studies is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

LP3M IAI Al-Urwatul Wutsqo Jombang, as the publisher of Al-Idaroh: Journal of Islamic Education Management Studies, is responsible for overseeing all stages of publication seriously and acknowledges ethical and other responsibilities. The institution is not only committed to ensuring that reprint advertising and other commercial revenues have no impact or influence on editorial decisions, but is also committed to assisting in communication with journal managers and/or other publishers if deemed useful and necessary.

​Publication Decision

The editor of Al-Idaroh: Journal of Islamic Education Management Studies is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.(plagiarism). The editor may consult with other editors or the review team in making this decision.

Fair Treatment

Editors always evaluate manuscripts based on their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

​Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the author, expert editors, bestari partners, and publishers.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

​Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with authors, may also help authors improve their writing.

​Speed

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

​Standard of Objectivity

Assessments must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should state their views clearly with supporting arguments.

​Source Acknowledgement

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work of which they have personal knowledge.

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Privileged information or opinions obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All financial support for the project should be disclosed.

​Reporting Standards

Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

​Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if they have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

​Multiple, Repeated or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

​Authorship of the Writing

Authorship should be limited to those who made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All persons who made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors (co-authors). If there are other people who participated in certain important aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors (contiributors). The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

​Fundamental errors in published works

If an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.